Difference between revisions of "Open Administration"

From democracy-handbook.org
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(8 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
An important principle in any democracy is the possibility for citizens to gain insight into the work of the three branches of government; that it is publicly available.
+
{{DemocracyLogo}}
 
+
An important principle in any democracy is the possibility for citizens to have access to insight into the work of the three branches of government; that government is publicly accessible.
This means that we as citizens have the right to follow the legislation process - we can show up in the parliament and follow the debate, we can read transcripts of it, or maybe it is even broadcast live on TV or on the Internet.
+
 
+
Openness in the administration also means that most hearings and trials are public, and that each one of us has access to knowledge about the information that the police and other institutions have about us. So there is both access to public records and access to public meetings, and that goes for both parliament, courts, and administration - legislative, judicial, and executive power.
+
 
+
In all cases there are exceptions, and most of them have to do with the security of the country. For example if the country is threatened by a foreign power. Regarding trials, the judge can also choose that hearings take place behind closed doors to protect the persons involved in the case.
+
 
+
It is hard to compare different countries, but openness in the administration is one of the questions that have caused much disagreement between the countries of the European Union. Generally the tendency is towards more openness, and especially since the Swedish joined the EU, things have been moving forward in this regard.
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
 
+
  
 +
This accessibility means that we as citizens have the right to follow the law-making process - we can come to parliament meetings and follow debates, we can read transcripts of debates, and debates may even be broadcast live on TV or on the Internet.
  
 +
Openness with regard to administration also means that most hearings and trials are public, and that every person has the right to access documents which the police and other authorities may possess containing information about them. There exists, in other words, openness regarding documents and meetings at all levels of social organization including parliament, the courts, and the administration - the legislative, the judicial, and the executive powers.
  
 +
There are, of course, exceptions in all of these areas, and most of them have to do with national security; for example, if the country is being threatened by a foreign power. Also, in the case of trials, the judge may decide that a hearing take place behind closed doors, in order to protect the people involved in the case.
  
 +
It is hard to compare degrees of openness in different countries, but openness with regard to administration is a question that has caused great disagreement among the countries of the European Union. The general tendency is towards increased openness, and, especially since Sweden joined the EU, things have improved in this regard.
  
 
----
 
----
To participate in the translation, click '''edit'''. Please write above the dotted line and be careful not to delete or change any of the text or code below it.
 
 
 
Next chapter: [[Local Politics and Participatory Democracy]]
 
Next chapter: [[Local Politics and Participatory Democracy]]
 
{{Languages|Open Administration}}
 
{{Languages|Open Administration}}
  
 
[[Category:English]]
 
[[Category:English]]

Latest revision as of 10:59, 1 December 2011

DemocracyHandbookApproved.png

An important principle in any democracy is the possibility for citizens to have access to insight into the work of the three branches of government; that government is publicly accessible.

This accessibility means that we as citizens have the right to follow the law-making process - we can come to parliament meetings and follow debates, we can read transcripts of debates, and debates may even be broadcast live on TV or on the Internet.

Openness with regard to administration also means that most hearings and trials are public, and that every person has the right to access documents which the police and other authorities may possess containing information about them. There exists, in other words, openness regarding documents and meetings at all levels of social organization including parliament, the courts, and the administration - the legislative, the judicial, and the executive powers.

There are, of course, exceptions in all of these areas, and most of them have to do with national security; for example, if the country is being threatened by a foreign power. Also, in the case of trials, the judge may decide that a hearing take place behind closed doors, in order to protect the people involved in the case.

It is hard to compare degrees of openness in different countries, but openness with regard to administration is a question that has caused great disagreement among the countries of the European Union. The general tendency is towards increased openness, and, especially since Sweden joined the EU, things have improved in this regard.


Next chapter: Local Politics and Participatory Democracy